Bernanke’s midterm tests, New York Times
I really can’t imagine that anyone wouldn’t reappoint Bernanke. To introduce someone new so quickly, especially after Greenspan’s long reign, may be more a sign of instability than anything. Adjustment takes time – being Fed chairman undoubtedly has quite a learning curve – and putting someone new in there probably won’t fix anything, especially since Bernanke has the academic credentials that should give him some credibility already.
Besides, it is recognized that a lot of what he has had to face was not caused by him – it’s the economy, and many factors were remnants of Greenspan’s reign (not blaming him, either, just saying – the issues preceded Bernanke). Think the housing market …
I don’t think the article mentions Bernanke’s latest transparency moves. I can’t say whether those are positive or not, though I think many view the newer policies as positive.
If it’s a midterm, the grading is going to be pretty subjective. Even if the effects -or state of the economy – is pretty obvious, whether or not it’s Bernanke’s fault, or just a poorly “written”/timed test, is still up for debate.
Krugman: Are we headed into a recession?
A Long Story from the NYT
I pretty much agree with his arguments. For some time, I’ve argued that the US was not headed into a recession, but somewhere along the line – after several indicators (perhaps hardest-hitting was the employment release) came out, I started to think that it might be a recession. And as Krugman points out, this recession may be relatively bad due to the combination of economic conditions now – though many economists think that the Fed can prevent recessions in magnitudes comparable to what we’ve seen in the past.
I guess we’ll just have to wait and see.